About Me

My name is Michael Morris, I am a photographer who came to photography later in life.  I started with digital and found it unrewarding so after a short time with MF, I moved to LF 4X5.  Almost everything I do now is large format B&W.  I am working to improve my technical and artistic skills constantly.  Living in Phoenix, I have access to some very good photographers who are willing to help and teach.  I am on a journey exploring photography, the US, and myself to some extent.  Along with my wife Mary, we are traveling the US together, cameras follow us everywhere and as we travel, this BLOG is updated.  It is very much a journal of my journey with ramblings about everything from the photograph I took while traveling, to the ah-ha moments when something new is grasped.

The old masters work is enthralling to me and I spend a lot of time looking at their work as well as most other work I have access to.  

 

Search
Login
Powered by Squarespace

Entries in photography (17)

Sunday
28Feb2010

Bold Contrast 1

This weekend turned into another disappointment because of inaccurate weather forecasts.  I was planning to spend one day waiting for light and another hiking in the Superstitions to get a good view of Weavers Needle.  But alas, because of the forecast of high winds on saturday (which never happened) we did not do the hike, postponed it until today.  Now it appears it will be raining most of the day and after the rain last night I do not with to be climbing around on the bedrock so no hike today.  But I may still be able to go to Lost Dutchman State Park and find some nice weather and light.  Maybe do a short hike there as well.

So the series on Quality of Light will start with a couple of bold contrast photos that I think worked.  Both of these were shot before I ever started thinking about bold contrast in the manner that I think of it today.  Both were pre-visualized to have strong contrast.  The top photo is gears in a machine at Saguaro Ranch Park.  The midday sun was shining directly on the machine with strong shadows.  There is no shadow detail and in this scan, no texture however in the print there is a little texture in the shadows.  But the highlights are there and the strong shadows which gives this a stark, almost harsh appearance which was the intention.    The shadows are small enough that the lack of detail is not distracting but large enough to be a significant part of the overall composition. 

The photo below is similar in that it was shot as a strong contrast scene to communicate the barren, harsh nature of the place, but was shot before I began thinking in the same lines as today.  Once again, detail is lost in the shadows and some of the highlights only have texture.  Strong and bold but those areas are small enough that it works, at least it works for me.  It says what I intended it to say and I find it visually pleasing.

 

Friday
19Feb2010

Prints

Over the last week, while waiting for Aperture I printed a few negatives that were in the queue.  Now printing is actually one of my least favorite things to do.  It is tedious, time consuming, frustrating, but the results are so rewarding I would not consider having anyone else print my B&W negatives.

Today there are plethora processes and technologies for making prints.  The digital technologies have come a very long way in a very short time.  But for me, nothing can beat a well printed silver print on good paper.  Yes, I have seen some very well done inkjet prints.  They are different, not bad different, just different.  For me, I prefer the silver prints.

Fine art photography is all about the print and it is very subjective so if I make art, why not use the medium which pleases me the most.  For now, that is the traditional silver print.  And printing them myself allows me to get from the negative what I envisioned when it was shot, but also to change it up as desired.  In other words, by printing myself, I have complete control.  If it is good, I get the credit, if it is not pleasing to me, no one else needs to see it.  My skills with printing digitally are weak to say the least.  I do not find it rewarding and it is always stressful so I rarely make inkjet prints myself and have weak skills in that area.

All of my negative are scanned and managed in Aperture.  It works well for me, like a contact sheet except I can also upload the scan without making a print.  I find that scanning negatives works well for small images and those targeted to computer displays.

The last 2 negative I printed were a bit dense, well okay, were way too dense.  When I scanned them they looked terrible but I could see plenty of detail in the negative so today I printed them and am quite pleased with the prints.  So for a bit of a change, below is comparisons of negative and print scans.  Both scanes were adjusted in Photoshop.  The negatives required more adjustments than the prints simply because they were so dense to start with.

This is the negative scan.  Mot bad, but not really exciting.  It took some special processing in the scanner software and PS to get this image.  

This is the print scan.  Unfortunately the scan is not as sharp as the print and since it was printed on warmtone paper, the file was converted to greyscale to remove that influence.  The print is beautiful, crisp, and a print I will be proud to show.  The negative scan is okay for my use but not somethign to show as good work.

Once more, the negative scan.  This was a bear to scan and adjust.  There is simply too much dynamic range.  But with enough work it is not bad.  

The print scan is much nicer.  It scanned much easier but it took 2 hours to get the print right in the darkroom.  But even then I was well pleased with the print and will be proud to show it.

Most of the photos I post here are negative scans.  Many times a photo is not posted simply because the scan is poor quality or that some of the adjustments done in the darkroom are beyond my skill in Photoshop.

This weekend I hope to spend in the field.  But there are several new posts in the queue so I hope to be more regular for a while.

Friday
12Feb2010

Thoughts on Composition, Design, and Analysis 

One of the Blogs I read recently had an post on composition and what I got out of it was that the author believes the proper way to take photographs is to analyze the composition and apply rules while shooting.  Anyone who has read this blog for a while knows that is contrary to my approach and I believe to the approach used by many very good photographers throughout history.  When in the field, shoot what moves you.  Sure, tweak it a bit from the first take if necessary, but I have found that usually the first take is close and too much adjustment takes away from the scene that moved you.

To me, art is not an intellectual activity, like accounting, engineering, etc., it is a communication of thoughts and ideas that are visceral in nature.  Perhaps no words can express the idea as well as the image, or sculpture, or music, but it is communication nonetheless.  Photography is a language and should say something.  When you spend too much time adjusting things to fit the "rules" you lose the communication.  It may be balanced and may fir all the criteria for a "good composition" but does it communicate something worthwhile.  

The author of the article stated that those who were opposed to his views were unwilling to improve their art.  Not knowing those people, I can not speak to that and neither can he.  To some it may appear that I am unwilling to improve and grow, but the opposite is true.  I always strive to grow in every aspect of my life, and none more so than photography.

Think about your approach and what you try to do.  Last night we say a film about photographers in the West in the late 1800's.  It was quite interesting, but one thing I got out of it was that the photographers who are remembered are those that had an artistic component to their work.  Many of the photographs we saw were quite moving.  And I dare say not a lot of thought was given to making sure the rule of thirds was followed, or any of the other rules.  They were good because they had something interesting to say.

If you are in Phoenix, be sure to go see the Ansel Adams exhibit at the Phoenix Art Museum.  His work is magnificent but the exhibit was put together in a manner that really showcases his work.  There are some negatives and chromes.  Some descriptions of how he did some of his work, much information to go along with the great prints.  Don't miss the exhibit!  I plan to make a few more trips down there to see this wonderful exhibit.

I have a couple of outings this weekend.  Today we are going to Sedona area and staying in the desert tomorrow.  I hope to have some work to talk about next week.

Friday
29Jan2010

Expression, Creativity, Mediums, and OMG Am I an Artist? 

Recently I have been rather quiet on this site.  Not due to a lack of creativity or effort but due to the type of work.  The software products I offer are showing their age and need to be updated.  I am rewriting them using native OSX tools.  There are many who claim to be Computer Scientists and practice software development as a scientific discipline.  When it comes right down to it, I have never seen anyone successfully practice software development as a science or engineering discipline.  Of course, I have not been in the mainstream for several years and can not speak to the current state but it is an art.  Like paining or writing it is something which requires skill, talent, and dedication to do well.  I am not speaking just about writing the code but the architecture and design as well.  

When it comes top producing art, I see almost any result from a creative endeavor as art.  There are many very good artists who work in ephemeral mediums.  Like chalk drawings on sidewalks, sand painting, etc.  But they have in common with other forms of art the vision, desire to create, and effort applied to instantiate the vision.  But I think of different attributes of different types of art.  Some attributes are concerning the medium, some the effort, some the result.

Medium related attributes include concrete medium, stone for carving, wood for building furniture, etc.  Another type of medium is manufactured, paints must be manufactured, although it may be the artist who manufactures the paint and that may be part of the art.. The last one is abstract, like writing or telling stories, writing software fits this mold as well.

Effort can be categorized as labor intensive, thought work, skilled, or inspirational.  I consider sculpture to be a very labor intensive art.  Thought work is along the lines of composing, writing, painting, not a huge physical effort and as the work is created it can take on a life of it’s own.  Inspirational is where I put photography and some painting, mostly abstract.

Results are varied I categorize them as physical,  utilitarian, temporal, abstract.  these are less clear than the medium or effort.  A piece of furniture is physical but it is usually also utilitarian.  But although it lasts possibly centuries, it is not fundamentally temporal in nature.  Movies, and music are temporal, but are stories?  CD’s are physical but the music is not, so I find it fits in the abstract category.  Actually most forms that require some sort of technology I consider to have an abstract form.  Computer software is one of the most abstract forms of creative work.  It is all abstract form concept to realization, but it can and should also be utilitarian.

So I have 2 forms of art that I produce, photography and computer software.  They are very different in their very nature.

Photography uses manufactured or abstract mediums.  It is mostly inspirational but can also be thought work but after a long session in the darkroom standing for several hours   I begin to think it is labor intensive even though it is not.  The results are physical or abstract.  Prints are physical things, images on a computer screen is abstract.  

Software uses an abstract medium although an argument could be made for an manufactured medium, I disagree.  It is very much thought work, the application or end product can take on a life of it’s own and become something very different than originally conceived.  The result is abstract.  

On long drives I often ponder different forms of art and discover things about the arts, artists, and myself.  It is an interesting exercise and can help you under stand yourself a little better.

I hope to get out to photograph this weekend and can then settle down and quit thinking all the time.  I am driving myself crazy with it!

Monday
04Jan2010

Return to Death Valley

 This was an interesting trip for several reasons.  Mary and I have been making journeys between Christmas and New Year's for 3 years now.  We do not celebrate New Year's in any traditional form so this is a nice way for us to celebrate.  We are somewhere we choose to be, doing what we love to do, together.  Rather a nice way to spend the changing of the year. 

This year we had our oldest son and his family here for Christmas so we could not leave on the 26th as usual, but we left on the 29th.  We pulled the trailer to Death Valley, arrived mid-day on the 30th and quickly set up and went out to photograph.  We stayed in the Furnace Creek campground which is a nice campground but it has no hookups, so we were dry-camping for 3 days.  It was the first time we have dry-camped and it worked out pretty good.  

The day of the 30th started out as thick overcast but had begun to break up by the time we were ready to go out.  It was a very good day to shoot except for the chill wind that was blowing.  We drove the Artist's Drive and photographed there a little before heading back to the trailer to have supper.

On the 31st we shot early morning light at Devil's Cornfield then headed into Beaty to find some cell signal and buy gas.  In the park the gas was almost $4.00/gal.  We then stopped by Rhyolote and then drove Titus Canyon back to the park.

Both of those are great places to photograph.  The bottle house in Rhyolite was open so I went in and made a couple of photos of the walls.  Then we went up to the caboose and made a couple more, had lunch and then headed toward Titus Canyon.  We took most of the remainder of the day to drive Titus Canyon.  We did go out and shoot the blue moon but alas, I mis-calculated the exposure and all of those shots were underexposed to the point of not useable.

New Year's day was cold, windy (no too bad), and total gray overcast.  There were no shadows whatsoever.  We went out for sunrise but made no pictures because the day started with a gradual lightening, no sun was visible.  So we took off for a drive in the Panamint Range.  It was a nice drive, we explored a site along the way and that is where the truck below was found.  We droe the road South then took the road in the Panamint Valley back to 189 before returning to the trailer.  

The next day was much better, we shot early morning light at Zabriskie Point.  It was another instance of most people shooting color and ignoring the light and shadows.  We got there and before long it was crowded, there must have been 50 tripods lined up on the edge waiting for sunrise.  It was getting lighter and then, before the sun actually made an appearance, most of the people were leaving.  Someone once told me that the best colors is before the sun comes up.  I have a bit of trouble believing that is the case, but for me, I want shadows, highlights, some bold definitions rather than color.  Even when shooting color, I look for interesting light in landscapes.  Some things work well in flat light but IMO, landscapes in flat light are a waste of time, to shoot and to view.  The photo above is one that was made that morning from Zabriskie Point.

After going back to the trailer, we packed up and headed for home.  I wanted to do Devils Golf Course and the Salt Flats but we simply ran out of time.  The forecast for the day was for no clouds at all and it was shaping up for a day of very harsh light.

We found some interesting buildings in the Panamint Range that I would like to return to and shoot.  I realized that when we travel I need to start keeping a journal that is searchable.  Talking about the different things in an area what worked, what didn't, what was skipped, and what could call us back.  It must be searchable and easy to maintain.  Not sure of what tool to use yet.