About Me

My name is Michael Morris, I am a photographer who came to photography later in life.  I started with digital and found it unrewarding so after a short time with MF, I moved to LF 4X5.  Almost everything I do now is large format B&W.  I am working to improve my technical and artistic skills constantly.  Living in Phoenix, I have access to some very good photographers who are willing to help and teach.  I am on a journey exploring photography, the US, and myself to some extent.  Along with my wife Mary, we are traveling the US together, cameras follow us everywhere and as we travel, this BLOG is updated.  It is very much a journal of my journey with ramblings about everything from the photograph I took while traveling, to the ah-ha moments when something new is grasped.

The old masters work is enthralling to me and I spend a lot of time looking at their work as well as most other work I have access to.  

 

Search
Login
Powered by Squarespace

Entries in alternative process (2)

Wednesday
Apr142010

Film Revisited

As with many, my income has slid downward with the current economic situation.  I am now pursuing some opportunities that would have been ignored a year ago.  I am also finding places that costs can be cut.  One area I am looking at is 8X10 film.  I never wish to compromise the quality of my work for cost.  So in looking at different films, quality is the uppermost priority.  

When I started large format photography, TMax was the film suggested.  In 4X5 it runs about $1.40/sheet.  The TMax 100 8X10 runs about $4.50/sheet.  I have found several people who hate TMax and other TGrain films.  I have heard different reasons from it is flat, to a simple, "I prefer the film I have used for the last 20 years".  Others love TMax film and will consider using nothing else.  Since I started using TMax and have only used one other with poor results, I am asking myself which camp I am in, or in the gray area.  Lack of experience is making me wonder if TMax is the best choice for me.

I recently discovered that TMax has a UV filter in the base which prevents use in alternative processes.  So if I wish to do alt processes, I must find another film to use for that.  Having another film is a minor inconvenience because you need to know the print type before shooting anyway.  But since I typically only carry 6 sheets of 8X10 with me, I must decide what I am shooting for before leaving the truck.  So this is beginning to turn into a hassle.

So I tried Adox CHS100 (same as Efke 100) and was pleased with the results.  I found that it seems I have more control over the film.  I can easily boost the contrast to a way over the top or subdue the contrast.  In short, I can control the film during development more easily than TMax.  The down-side is, the wet emulsion is very soft and I have damaged (read ruined) several sheets.  That is an solvable problem but will take work.  In short, I do not believe the quality will suffer by using the newer film.  At $2.50/sheet, the film is more affordable and it prints well in silver and alt processes.  There are 2 things standing in the way of switching over to Adox/Efke film.  It is not carried locally and I like to support local businesses.  The other is, ISO 100 is the fastest available.  There are times when ISO 400 is desirable.  So do I stick with TMax 400 (no alt process available) or try Ilford HP5 Plus to see how it fits.

All in all I think a change is in my future, carrying 3 or 4 different types of film is asking for trouble.  Carrying 2 types is bad enough but the chance of mistakes that ruin negatives goes up drastically as you introduce more different types.

Then there comes the thought os 4X5.  Same film there, or stick with TMax for 4X5.  Not an easy answer.

Thursday
Mar112010

One Last Floral

We are leaving on another trip tomorrow.  We will be gone about a week and will be heading to NW New Mexico and NE Arizona.  Bisti Badlands, Chaco Canyon, Aztec NM, Shiprock, and Canyon de Chelly.  Due to the economy this may the be last trip we take for quite some time.

During one of the sets with the new flowers I used the 8X10 and developed the film to have more contrast than usual.  This was to experiment more with alternative processes.  I have been working with Cyanotype, VanDyke, and Kallitype.  The print shown above is a Kallitype print.  It is a close relative to Platinum and Palladium but is much less expensive.  When I was doing the alt process work before I was never quite satisfied with the results using the digital negatives.  Many people today use digital negatives and some who are well experienced with alternative process have switched from analog to digital negatives.  As with other forms of photography, I prefer the look and feel of analog.  Digital will definitely improve but it will always be a different medium than film.  Some people will prefer film as long as it is available.

In any case, producing good analog negatives for alternative processes is a bit of a challenge.  One of the negative I was working with required a 6+ hour exposure using Cyanotype while another one required a 1 hour exposure.  KAllitype is faster, the print above was using a 6 minute exposure.  I hope to do quite a bit more alternative process prints in the coming months.